🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord designed to protect women from abuse, including family violence, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the vote. The final authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a decision that rights groups characterized as a major regression for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary parties supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread protest both inside Latvia and internationally.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a national petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority support, the president could possibly send back the legislation for additional review if he holds objections.

President Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," stated a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires specific legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could affect similar debates in other EU countries